SOC 2 Type 1 vs. Type 2: Which Report Do You Need?
In the world of B2B software, trust is paramount. When you hand over your data to a SaaS vendor, you need assurance that they are handling it responsibly. This is where SOC 2 comes in. It’s not just a checkbox; it’s a framework for building and demonstrating a commitment to security and privacy. But the SOC 2 landscape can be confusing and overwhelming, especially with its two main report types: Type 1 and Type 2.
Understanding the difference is critical for both vendors proving their security posture and buyers evaluating potential partners. This blog will break down SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 reports, giving you a better understanding of their purpose, scope, and when to use each one. You will walk away knowing exactly which report meets your needs, whether you’re a startup building credibility or an enterprise buyer vetting vendors.
Before diving into the report types, let’s clarify what SOC 2 is. Developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is an auditing procedure that ensures a service provider securely manages data to protect the interests of their clients.
The audit is conducted against one or more of the five Trust Services Criteria (TSC):
- Security: Protecting information and systems against unauthorized access. This is the mandatory criterion for any SOC 2 report.
- Availability: Ensuring information and systems are available for operation and use as agreed.
- Processing Integrity: Verifying that system processing is complete, valid, accurate, and timely.
- Confidentiality: Protecting information designated as confidential.
- Privacy: Addressing the collection, use, retention, and disclosure of personal information.
An independent CPA firm completes the audit and issues a report based on these criteria. This brings us to the two types of reports you can get.
What is SOC 2? A Quick Recap
A SOC 2 Type 1 report is a point-in-time snapshot of a company’s security controls. Think of it as an architectural blueprint. An auditor determines whether your security controls are designed appropriately to meet the relevant Trust Services Criteria as of a specific date.
The key question a Type 1 report answers is: “Do you have the right controls in place?” It describes the vendor’s systems and assesses if the design of their security processes and controls is suitable.
Deliverables & Timeline:
- Deliverable: A report from a CPA that describes the organization’s system and provides the auditor’s opinion on the suitability of the design of its controls.
- Timeline: A Type 1 audit is relatively quick, often taking 1-3 months from readiness to final report.
A Type 1 report is a great starting point for companies beginning their compliance journey.
What is a SOC 2 Type 1 Report?
A SOC 2 Type 2 report goes a significant step further. It assesses not only the design of your controls but also their operating effectiveness over a period of time. Instead of a snapshot, it’s a historical record of performance.
The key question a Type 2 report answers is: “Are your controls actually working as intended, day in and day out?” Auditors will test your controls by examining evidence collected over an observation window, which typically ranges from 3 to 12 months.
Evidence & Timeline:
- Evidence: Auditors will request proof that controls are functioning. This could include system logs, change management records, employee onboarding checklists, and incident response reports.
- Timeline: A Type 2 audit is a longer commitment. The observation period itself is several months long, and the entire process from start to finish can take anywhere from 6 to 15 months.
What is a SOC 2 Type 2 Report?
While it’s easy to think of a Type 2 as simply “better,” they serve different purposes. Let’s break down the distinctions in plain language.
- Scope & Timeframe: A Type 1 is a snapshot of control design on a single day. A Type 2 is a video recording of those controls in action over several months.
- Evidence Required: For a Type 1, you primarily provide documentation like policies and procedures. For a Type 2, you must provide tangible evidence that you followed those policies consistently over the audit period.
- Level of Assurance: A Type 1 report provides a moderate level of assurance. It confirms you have a good plan. A Type 2 report provides a much higher level of assurance because it proves your plan works in practice.
- Buyer Perception: A Type 1 is often seen as a good first step, but sophisticated buyers, especially in the enterprise space, almost always expect a Type 2 report. It demonstrates a mature and sustained security program.
- Cost & Effort: Due to its shorter duration and simpler evidence requirements, a Type 1 audit is less expensive and requires less internal effort than a Type 2. The extensive testing and longer observation period make a Type 2 a more significant investment.
Key Differences Explained
The right report depends on your company’s maturity, market, and customer expectations.
- Scenario 1: The Early-Stage Startup
An innovative SaaS company is raising a seed round and landing its first few customers. Security questions are starting to come up, but they have limited resources.
Recommendation: Start with a SOC 2 Type 1. It allows the startup to formally document its controls and show prospective customers and investors they are serious about security. It’s a powerful tool to build initial trust without the lengthy commitment of a Type 2. - Scenario 2: The Mid-Market Growth Company
A company has found product-market fit and is moving upmarket. Its sales team is increasingly blocked by security reviews from larger customers who need proof of operational security.
Recommendation: Pursue a SOC 2 Type 2. While they may have started with a Type 1, the market now demands a higher level of assurance. A Type 2 report will unblock enterprise sales cycles and become a key competitive differentiator. - Scenario 3: The Enterprise Procurement Team
A large corporation is evaluating a new critical software vendor that will handle sensitive customer data.
Recommendation: Require a SOC 2 Type 2. For a mission-critical tool, a point-in-time design review (Type 1) is insufficient. The procurement and security teams need to see evidence that the vendor’s controls have been operating effectively over time to minimize risk.
When to Choose Type 1 vs. Type 2: Common Scenarios
- “SOC 2 is a certification.” It’s not. It is an attestation report that provides an auditor’s opinion. You don’t “pass” or “fail” in the traditional sense, but you can receive a qualified opinion or findings that you’ll need to address.
- “A Type 1 is all we’ll ever need.” For many companies, a Type 1 is a bridge to a Type 2. As you grow, customer expectations will evolve, and a Type 2 will likely become a requirement.
- “We can get a Type 2 report in two months.” The observation period alone is a minimum of three months. Be realistic about timelines and plan accordingly.
Common Misconceptions and Pitfalls
Whether you’re aiming for Type 1 or Type 2, preparation is key.
- Conduct a Readiness Assessment: Identify gaps between your current practices and the SOC 2 criteria.
- Establish Clear Policies: Document your security policies and procedures.
- Assign Control Ownership: Make sure every control has a designated owner responsible for its operation and evidence collection.
- Implement Tooling and Logging: Use tools to automate control monitoring and ensure you are logging all necessary system activity.
- Manage Your Vendors: Your security is only as strong as your vendors’. Assess their security posture.
- Train Your Team: Security is a team sport. Ensure all employees understand their responsibilities through regular security awareness training.
How to Prepare for a SOC 2 Audit
Making the choice doesn’t have to be complicated.
- Assess Your Customer Base: Are they small businesses or large enterprises? Enterprise customers almost always require a Type 2.
- Review Your Sales Process: Are security questionnaires from prospects slowing you down or blocking deals? A Type 2 can accelerate sales.
- Evaluate Your Resources: Do you have the budget and personnel for a 6-12 month Type 2 audit process? If not, a Type 1 is a pragmatic first step.
- Consider Your Timeline: Do you need a report urgently to close a specific deal? A Type 1 is faster to achieve.
Essentially, the decision flows like this: If you need to build trust now with limited resources, start with a Type 1. If you need to win and retain enterprise customers, you must plan for and achieve a Type 2.
A Simple Checklist for Your Decision
SOC 2 isn’t just about passing an audit; it’s about building a culture of security that protects your customers and your business. A Type 1 report demonstrates intent, showing you have a well-designed security program. A Type 2 report demonstrates commitment, proving that your program works effectively over time.
By understanding the differences and aligning your choice with your business goals, you can use SOC 2 not as a hurdle, but as a powerful tool to build lasting trust with your customers.
To find out more about SOC2 , do not hesitate to contact Us Today